<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Part 2: Broxson Talks Bonds</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fortbendnow.com/2010/03/10/44441/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fortbendnow.com/2010/03/10/44441</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 19:39:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: 1trueconservative</title>
		<link>http://www.fortbendnow.com/2010/03/10/44441/comment-page-1#comment-11294</link>
		<dc:creator>1trueconservative</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 14:11:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fortbendnow.com/?p=44441#comment-11294</guid>
		<description>--I found these older related articles that seem to contradict some of Mr. Broxson&#039;s claims in this interview series above. The first demonstrates votes that increased spending while facing the first of 3 budget deficits and the second discusses the conflict and finger pointing that began almost 2 years ago over the record bond debt that was pushed and passed by Mr Jenney and Charlie Howard supporters (developers and district vendors). It seems to counter much of what Broxson is claiming above:

FB Sun Covers First Ever FBISD Budget Deficit!
Fort Bend ISD approves proposed budget

By DIANE TEZENO
Published: 08.27.08

Fort Bend ISD board members made no modifications to the district’s proposed $477.5 budget despite opposition from several residents and a state official to various aspects of the 2008-09 budget.

Board members gave their “OK” to the budget despite a $9.9 million deficit, and also gave the green light to several major expenditure increases, including employee pay raises.

The approved budget includes a 3 percent pay increase on base salary for all district employees, bringing starting salaries for teachers to $44,000.

The newly approved budget also includes $5.1 million for additional staffing, $1.2 million in TASB proposed equity adjustments and $2.26 million in increases for vehicle fuel inflation, among other expenditures.

Prior to the budget’s approval, several speakers voiced opposition to aspects of the budget, including Texas State Rep. Charlie Howard. . .

. . . Board members listened to several other comments from the public on the proposed budget, including

former school board candidate and Fresno resident Rodrigo Carreon.

“Some of our staff here have been working 23 years and never got a raise,” said Carreon.

Carreon questioned why funds from the district were going to the state.

The Fresno resident recommended the district look at alternative fuels such as natural gas versus diesel to save on fuel expenses.

A member of the Fort Bend Employee Federation encouraged the board to improve pay increases for classified employees and teachers above TASB recommendations.

“Equity adjustments and pay increases won’t lift our employees above the poverty level,” said the federation member, echoing a sentiment shared by an earlier speaker.

Richmond resident, Chris Calvin, said he would like to see the board take a closer look at the fund balance.

“Why with all of this money can’t we balance the budget without a tax increase this year,” said Calvin, citing open record information showing the district with a $93.8 million fund balance.

Fort Bend resident Carlos Kane told board members that he did not want to see his property taxes go up.

He expressed strong opposition to board members for proposing the .02 cent tax increase and encouraged board members to remedy the budget deficit through monies in the fund balance rather than by increasing taxes on homeowners.

“I have no objection to teacher’s getting their raises, they should have gotten them a long time ago,” said Kane.

“What I have an objection to is the $100 million dollars that you all had stashed in a trust fund,” said Kane

AND&gt; 

FortBendNow: Bhuchar Issues Statement On FBISD Budget, Howard Criticism

In a statement issued late Friday afternoon, Fort Bend ISD Board President Sonal Bhuchar said “the record must be set straight” over the district’s recent decision to raise the district’s debt service tax rate for the upcoming fiscal year.

During a public hearing on the proposed budget and tax rate, State Rep. Charlie Howard (R-Sugar Land) criticized trustees for raising the tax rate when other public entities were either lowering or maintaining existing rates. 

Howard’s remarks brought strong rebukes from trustees Steve Smelley and Bob Broxson. Smelley said he was “humiliated” by Howard’s statement, while Broxson suggested Howard did not support public education.

In a later statement to FortBendNow, Howard said he had not intended to insult trustees, but his goal in representing constituents was to see their property tax burden lowered. Howard also said he was addressing the board as a resident and taxpayer, and not in his role as a state representative. 

In her statement, Bhuchar cited Howard’s remarks. She defended the board’s decision to raise the debt service tax rate, saying that voters approved the increase as a part of last year’s bond referendum...

---------------------
This is the same RECORD bond election that Howard and his edc PAC helped push. He then comes back to the district and complains when they have to increase taxes to begin to pay off this debt...it would seem now that Broxson is denying that these were the issues that have significantly contributed to the current 3rd consecutive budget crisis and he doesn&#039;t even mention the &quot;Global Taj Mahal&quot; and the $30 million being held in reserve for that special project that apparently does not have community support.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8211;I found these older related articles that seem to contradict some of Mr. Broxson&#8217;s claims in this interview series above. The first demonstrates votes that increased spending while facing the first of 3 budget deficits and the second discusses the conflict and finger pointing that began almost 2 years ago over the record bond debt that was pushed and passed by Mr Jenney and Charlie Howard supporters (developers and district vendors). It seems to counter much of what Broxson is claiming above:</p>
<p>FB Sun Covers First Ever FBISD Budget Deficit!<br />
Fort Bend ISD approves proposed budget</p>
<p>By DIANE TEZENO<br />
Published: 08.27.08</p>
<p>Fort Bend ISD board members made no modifications to the district’s proposed $477.5 budget despite opposition from several residents and a state official to various aspects of the 2008-09 budget.</p>
<p>Board members gave their “OK” to the budget despite a $9.9 million deficit, and also gave the green light to several major expenditure increases, including employee pay raises.</p>
<p>The approved budget includes a 3 percent pay increase on base salary for all district employees, bringing starting salaries for teachers to $44,000.</p>
<p>The newly approved budget also includes $5.1 million for additional staffing, $1.2 million in TASB proposed equity adjustments and $2.26 million in increases for vehicle fuel inflation, among other expenditures.</p>
<p>Prior to the budget’s approval, several speakers voiced opposition to aspects of the budget, including Texas State Rep. Charlie Howard. . .</p>
<p>. . . Board members listened to several other comments from the public on the proposed budget, including</p>
<p>former school board candidate and Fresno resident Rodrigo Carreon.</p>
<p>“Some of our staff here have been working 23 years and never got a raise,” said Carreon.</p>
<p>Carreon questioned why funds from the district were going to the state.</p>
<p>The Fresno resident recommended the district look at alternative fuels such as natural gas versus diesel to save on fuel expenses.</p>
<p>A member of the Fort Bend Employee Federation encouraged the board to improve pay increases for classified employees and teachers above TASB recommendations.</p>
<p>“Equity adjustments and pay increases won’t lift our employees above the poverty level,” said the federation member, echoing a sentiment shared by an earlier speaker.</p>
<p>Richmond resident, Chris Calvin, said he would like to see the board take a closer look at the fund balance.</p>
<p>“Why with all of this money can’t we balance the budget without a tax increase this year,” said Calvin, citing open record information showing the district with a $93.8 million fund balance.</p>
<p>Fort Bend resident Carlos Kane told board members that he did not want to see his property taxes go up.</p>
<p>He expressed strong opposition to board members for proposing the .02 cent tax increase and encouraged board members to remedy the budget deficit through monies in the fund balance rather than by increasing taxes on homeowners.</p>
<p>“I have no objection to teacher’s getting their raises, they should have gotten them a long time ago,” said Kane.</p>
<p>“What I have an objection to is the $100 million dollars that you all had stashed in a trust fund,” said Kane</p>
<p>AND&gt; </p>
<p>FortBendNow: Bhuchar Issues Statement On FBISD Budget, Howard Criticism</p>
<p>In a statement issued late Friday afternoon, Fort Bend ISD Board President Sonal Bhuchar said “the record must be set straight” over the district’s recent decision to raise the district’s debt service tax rate for the upcoming fiscal year.</p>
<p>During a public hearing on the proposed budget and tax rate, State Rep. Charlie Howard (R-Sugar Land) criticized trustees for raising the tax rate when other public entities were either lowering or maintaining existing rates. </p>
<p>Howard’s remarks brought strong rebukes from trustees Steve Smelley and Bob Broxson. Smelley said he was “humiliated” by Howard’s statement, while Broxson suggested Howard did not support public education.</p>
<p>In a later statement to FortBendNow, Howard said he had not intended to insult trustees, but his goal in representing constituents was to see their property tax burden lowered. Howard also said he was addressing the board as a resident and taxpayer, and not in his role as a state representative. </p>
<p>In her statement, Bhuchar cited Howard’s remarks. She defended the board’s decision to raise the debt service tax rate, saying that voters approved the increase as a part of last year’s bond referendum&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;<br />
This is the same RECORD bond election that Howard and his edc PAC helped push. He then comes back to the district and complains when they have to increase taxes to begin to pay off this debt&#8230;it would seem now that Broxson is denying that these were the issues that have significantly contributed to the current 3rd consecutive budget crisis and he doesn&#8217;t even mention the &#8220;Global Taj Mahal&#8221; and the $30 million being held in reserve for that special project that apparently does not have community support.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bladerunner</title>
		<link>http://www.fortbendnow.com/2010/03/10/44441/comment-page-1#comment-11292</link>
		<dc:creator>bladerunner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 03:29:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fortbendnow.com/?p=44441#comment-11292</guid>
		<description>Now this seems odd. First he claims we have a financial emergency created by the state while we sit on funding for a new science center at the central office apparently costing us 20-30 million. I guess I don&#039;t get it. What kind of financial management is this? Looks like the kids are going to pay again for poor leadership!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now this seems odd. First he claims we have a financial emergency created by the state while we sit on funding for a new science center at the central office apparently costing us 20-30 million. I guess I don&#8217;t get it. What kind of financial management is this? Looks like the kids are going to pay again for poor leadership!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sugarland watch</title>
		<link>http://www.fortbendnow.com/2010/03/10/44441/comment-page-1#comment-11291</link>
		<dc:creator>Sugarland watch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 01:35:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fortbendnow.com/?p=44441#comment-11291</guid>
		<description>santhony, Right on the nose about the RECORD bond passed.It is now 1.6 Billon</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>santhony, Right on the nose about the RECORD bond passed.It is now 1.6 Billon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: santhony</title>
		<link>http://www.fortbendnow.com/2010/03/10/44441/comment-page-1#comment-11287</link>
		<dc:creator>santhony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 21:06:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fortbendnow.com/?p=44441#comment-11287</guid>
		<description>&quot;Despite public comments to the contrary, outgoing Fort Bend Independent School District Board President Bob Broxson said the district’s 2007 $428 million bond has nothing to do with the district’s growing financial crisis.&quot;--Over half of the bond committee was made up of GFBCEDC member company reps and Ed. Foundation members. The other half was the general public and all were selected and approved by the administration. As a matter of fact one &quot;general public&quot; member and another pastor both agreed they did not have enough information supplied independently to be  making some of these decisions. One of them we know personally actually voted against it. I see several very misleading statements by Broxson on this RECORD bond debt that was pushed by Jenney and the EDC members. Most remember the ad that was purchased with developer money and Charlie Howard in one of the local majr papers stating we needed it to &quot;increase our property values&quot;. It sure increased the debt load and the debt service portion coming from the operations budget that does impact the teachers salaries and other campus based projects. If you google the releases of that time or attended the meetings as we did, you would remember that at the first tax hearing following the passage of the RECORD bond that the past BOT president and VP pointed the finger at Mr. Howard and stated, when he opposed the tax increase (one of several), that it had everything to do with the RECORD bond passed (the reason for the tax increase).

I know we can expect another one, but Mr. Broxson needs to at least get his facts straight before he hands these problems off to the next group of board members. Twi of which are hand selected once again by Jenney to run.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Despite public comments to the contrary, outgoing Fort Bend Independent School District Board President Bob Broxson said the district’s 2007 $428 million bond has nothing to do with the district’s growing financial crisis.&#8221;&#8211;Over half of the bond committee was made up of GFBCEDC member company reps and Ed. Foundation members. The other half was the general public and all were selected and approved by the administration. As a matter of fact one &#8220;general public&#8221; member and another pastor both agreed they did not have enough information supplied independently to be  making some of these decisions. One of them we know personally actually voted against it. I see several very misleading statements by Broxson on this RECORD bond debt that was pushed by Jenney and the EDC members. Most remember the ad that was purchased with developer money and Charlie Howard in one of the local majr papers stating we needed it to &#8220;increase our property values&#8221;. It sure increased the debt load and the debt service portion coming from the operations budget that does impact the teachers salaries and other campus based projects. If you google the releases of that time or attended the meetings as we did, you would remember that at the first tax hearing following the passage of the RECORD bond that the past BOT president and VP pointed the finger at Mr. Howard and stated, when he opposed the tax increase (one of several), that it had everything to do with the RECORD bond passed (the reason for the tax increase).</p>
<p>I know we can expect another one, but Mr. Broxson needs to at least get his facts straight before he hands these problems off to the next group of board members. Twi of which are hand selected once again by Jenney to run.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

